Adaptative Strategy of Immunosuppressive Drugs Dosage Adjustments When Combined With Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With COVID-19.

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is a promising option for preventing severe COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, concerns have arisen regarding potential drug interactions with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). This two-phase multicentre retrospective study, involving 113 patients on tacrolimus and 13 on cyclosporine A, aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes of recommendations issued by The French societies of transplantation (SFT) and pharmacology (SFPT) for CNI management in this context. The study first evaluated adherence to recommendations, CNI exposure, and clinical outcomes. Notably, 96.5% of patients on tacrolimus adhered to the recommendations, maintaining stable tacrolimus trough concentrations (C0) during nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment. After reintroduction, most patients experienced increased C0, with 42.9% surpassing 15 ng/mL, including three patients exceeding 40 ng/mL. Similar trends were observed in cyclosporine A patients, with no COVID-19-related hospitalizations. Moreover, data from 22 patients were used to refine the reintroduction strategy. Modelling analyses suggested reintroducing tacrolimus at 50% of the initial dose on day 8, and then at 100% from day 9 as the optimal approach. In conclusion, the current strategy effectively maintains consistent tacrolimus exposure during nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment, and a stepwise reintroduction of tacrolimus may be better suited to the low CYP3A recovery.

Progression of histological lesions after ABO incompatible kidney transplantation.

Recent large meta-analyses suggested a poorer long-term patients' and grafts' outcomes after ABO incompatible (ABOi) living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) compared to ABO compatible LDKT. However, little is known about the long-term histological pattern after ABOi LDKT. We compared the histological features observed on protocol biopsies from 03/11 to 11/19 in 94 ABOi LDKT (including 14 with preformed Donor Specific Antibodies, pDSAs), 27 LDKT ABO compatible (ABOc) with pDSAs, and 21 ABOc without pDSAs) during the first five years post transplantation. During the first 5 years post-transplantation, a progression of chronic lesions (patients with a ci >0 raised from 11% to 65%, p<0.0001, patients with a ct >0 raised from 29% to 78%, p<0.0001) was observed in ABOi LDKT without pDSAs. Histological patterns of evolution were comparable to those observed in ABOc kidney transplant patients. Microvascular inflammation was lower in ABOi LDKT without pDSAs compared to those with pDSAs (ABOi or ABOc). At last follow-up, 28 months, IQR (15-48) post-transplantation, 29 patients (36%) had a severe graft dysfunction (defined by a CKD-epi eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m²). The donor age was a predictive factor for the development of severe kidney allograft dysfunction at last follow-up (HR= 1.05, 95% CI [1.05-1.10], p= 0.03). Hence, long-term histological analysis of ABOi LDKT shows only an increase of chronic interstitial and tubular atrophy changes, without active lesions. These data confirm that ABOi LDKT programs can be securely developed.

Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses of Solid Organ Transplant Patients on Belatacept to Three Doses of mRNA-Based Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.

BACKGROUND: Two doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based vaccines are poorly immunogenic in solid organ transplant recipients (SOT). METHODS: In total, 68 belatacept-treated SOT recipients followed at the Toulouse University Hospital were investigated. They were given three injections of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Their humoral response was assessed by determining anti-spike antibodies and neutralizing antibodies. The T-cell responses were assessed using an enzyme-linked immunospot assay that measured the interferon-γ produced by specific SARS-CoV-2 T-cells in a subgroup of 17 patients. RESULTS: Only 23.5% of these patients developed a detectable anti-spike response. Moreover, the cellular and the humoral responses were well correlated. Patients with no humoral response were also without a detectable cellular response. Those belatacept-treated patients who developed an Anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral response were younger, had been transplanted for longer, and had a higher lymphocyte count and a better glomerular filtration rate than those with no response. Finally, patients on tacrolimus plus belatacept produced a lower immune response. CONCLUSIONS: Belatacept-treated SOT recipients have a reduced immune response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. The vaccine should be given quite separately from the belatacept infusion to improve immunogenicity. Studies to assess whether switching to another immunosuppressive regimen can improve the post-vaccination immune response would be useful.

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and neutralizing antibodies at 1 and 3 months after three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in a large cohort of solid organ transplant patients.

The immunogenicity of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine was improved by the administration of a third dose. The aim of our retrospective study was to assess the evolution of binding and neutralizing antibody concentration until 3 months after the third dose in a large cohort of solid organ transplant (SOT) patients (n = 872). At 1 month after the third dose, anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests in 578 patients (66.3%). In a subgroup of patients, 70% (180 out of 257) had anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations ranging from 1.2 to 18 411 binding antibody units (BAU)/ml and 48.5% (115 out of 239) had a neutralizing antibodies titer that can confer clinical protection against SARS-CoV-2. Three-hundred ninety-three patients out of the 416 (94.5%) who were seropositive at month 1 and were tested at 3 months after vaccination remained seropositive. Between months 1 and 3 after vaccination, binding and neutralizing antibodies concentrations decreased significantly. The proportion of protected patients against the SARS-CoV-2 also slightly decreased. In conclusion, this study shows that although two-third of SOT develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after three doses, one-third of them remain weak or non-protected. It is important to measure anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies to define the strategy that can optimize SOT protection against SARS-CoV-2.

Predictive Factors for Humoral Response After 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Solid Organ Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: A weak immunogenicity has been reported in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients after 2 doses of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify the predictive factors for humoral response in SOT patients. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-three SOT patients from our center with at least 4 wk of follow-up after 2 doses of mRNA-based vaccine were included in this study. Anti-SARS-Cov-2 spike protein antibodies were assessed before and after vaccination. RESULTS: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 34% of the patients: 33.7% of kidney transplant patients, 47.7% of liver transplant patients, and 14.3% of thoracic transplant patients (P = 0.005). Independent predictive factors for humoral response after vaccination were male gender, a longer period between transplantation and vaccination, liver transplant recipients, a higher lymphocyte count at baseline, a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate and receiving the tacrolimus + everolimus ± steroids combination. Conversely, the nondevelopment of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after vaccination was associated with younger patients, thoracic organ recipients, induction therapy recipients, and tacrolimus + mycophenolic acid ± steroids recipients. CONCLUSIONS: The immunosuppressive regimen is a modifiable predictive factor for humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Tacrolimus Intrapatient Variability After Switching From Immediate or Prolonged-Release to Extended-Release Formulation, After an Organ Transplantation.

Background and Purpose: Several formulations of tacrolimus are available, but evidence of the benefit of changing to the most recent formulations is lacking. Tacrolimus intra-patient variability (tacrolimus IPV) is an emerging risk factor associated with poor graft outcomes after solid organ transplantations. Here, we examined the modifications of tacrolimus IPV after switching to a different formulation of tacrolimus. Experimental Approach: We identified 353 solid organ transplant recipients that were switched in our center from immediate-release (IR-tacrolimus) or prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-tacrolimus) to extended-release, LCP-tacrolimus (LCP-tacrolimus). Among them, 54 patients underwent at least 3 available tacrolimus blood concentrations before and after the switch, allowing us to investigate tacrolimus IPV. Key Results: The switch was considered as a safe procedure since only four of the 353 patients presented a graft rejection after the switch, and no patient was hospitalized for tacrolimus overdose. The tacrolimus IPV estimated by the coefficient of variation (CV-IPV) was stable before and after the switch to LCP-tacrolimus (CV-IPV: 29.0% (IQR 25-75 (15.5; 38.5) before and 24.0% (15.8; 36.5) after the switch, p = 0.65). Conclusion and Implications: Switching from IR- or PR-tacrolimus to LCP-tacrolimus is a safe procedure. However, the CV-tacrolimus IPV was not impacted by the change of formulation.

Therapeutic education as a tool to improve patient-reported and clinical outcomes after renal transplantation: results of the EPHEGREN multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Patients are not always aware of the inconveniences associated with renal transplantation, which they compare with a « rebirth ¼, and from which they expect complete recovery. Therapeutic education is proposed to prepare patients for their life after transplantation. This study evaluated the impact of pretransplant therapeutic education on patient-reported outcomes and rejection-free survival over the first year. We collected data from 383 renal transplant patients followed-up in seven centers. Patients who benefited from therapeutic education before transplantation (N = 182) were compared with patients who did not (N = 139) for quality-of-life, adherence and adverse events using the Pearson's chi-square test, one-way ANOVA or t-test. The association between therapeutic education and time to acute rejection was investigated using Cox models. The patients who benefited from therapeutic education reported adverse events less frequently (e.g., tremor: 9% vs. 32.4%, P = 0.01) and better quality-of-life (MCS-QOL: 50.7 ± 8.1 vs. 47.7 ± 9.5, P = 0.02; PCS-QOL: 49.1 ± 7.1 vs. 46.0 ± 9.2, P = 0.013). No difference was found on adherence. Rejection-free survival was slightly better in the therapeutic education group (HR = 0.44, 95% CI = [0.19-1.01]). This multicenter retrospective cohort study suggests that integrating therapeutic education to care pathways entails clinical benefit, in terms of quality-of-life, self-reported adverse events and rejection-free survival. Randomized clinical trials are necessary to confirm this.

Do anti-IL-6R blockers have a beneficial effect in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection resistant to standard therapy after kidney transplantation?

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) that resists to standard of care (SOC) therapy remains a major challenge after kidney transplantation and leads to graft failure in a majority of cases. The use of anti-IL6 receptor antibodies was suggested to treat chronic antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) after failure of classical treatments. We treated nine patients with AMR resistant to apheresis, rituximab, and intravenous immunoglobulins, with a monthly infusion of tocilizumab and compared them with a historical cohort of 37 patients with similar clinical, immunological, and histological characteristics. The 1-year graft survival and the decline in renal function did not differ between patients who received tocilizumab and those who did not. Histological follow-up showed that despite a decrease in inflammation and tubulitis scores after tocilizumab, the course of antibody-mediated lesions and chronic glomerulopathy were similar in both groups. In our study, the addition of monthly infusions of tocilizumab did not alter the course of AMR that resist to SOC therapy. Large randomized studies are urgently needed to assess the effect of tocilizumab in this context.

A Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Anti-T-Lymphocyte Igs to Basiliximab in Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: Two prospective studies that were performed before the era of highly sensitive solid-phase assays have shown a lower incidence of acute rejection in highly sensitized kidney-transplant patients given polyclonal antibodies compared with those given anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies. METHODS: This prospective pilot randomized French multicenter study aimed to compare anti-T-lymphocyte Ig (ATLG) (n = 32) and basiliximab (n = 27) in highly sensitized kidney-transplant patients without preformed donor-specific antibodies (pDSAs) as assessed by a Luminex Single-Antigen flow bead assay. Only patients with a calculated panel reactive antibody ≥50%, with at least 1 antibody with a mean fluorescence intensity ≥5000 and without a historical pDSA and without a pDSA on the day of transplantation were included. RESULTS: Treatment failure as defined by biopsy-proven acute rejection, patient lost to follow-up, graft loss, and death was observed in 18.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.9%-37.1%) and 18.8% (95% CI, 8.9%-37.1%) in patients who received ATLG and 14.8% (95% CI, 5.8%-34.8%) and 28.2% (95% CI, 14.2%-51.2%) of patients who received basiliximab, respectively at 6 (P = 0.66) and 12 (P = 0.62) months post-transplantation. One T cell-mediated rejection was observed in ATLG-treated patients (3.1%). One antibody-mediated rejection due to a de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA) occurred in basiliximab-treated patients (3.7%). Patient survival, graft survival, kidney parameters, and infection rate were similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: This pilot study indicates that in highly sensitized kidney-transplant patients without pDSAs, both ATLG and basiliximab can be used efficiently and safely. However, because of the lack of power, these results should be interpreted with caution.

Adherence profiles in kidney transplant patients: Causes and consequences.

OBJECTIVE: Adherence is a dynamic phenomenon and a critical determinant of transplant patients outcome. The objective of this longitudinal study was to explore adherence in kidney transplant patients followed-up for up to three years after transplantation. METHODS: Adherence was repeatedly estimated using the Morisky-Green-Levine 4-Item Medication Adherence Scale, in two successive cohorts of 345 (EPIGREN) and 367 (EPHEGREN) kidney transplant recipients. Mixed effect modeling with latent processes and latent classes was used to describe adherence time-profiles. RESULTS: Two latent classes were identified. The adherent class represented 85% of the patients. Patients of the poorer-adherence class displayed a lower adherence at one month (p<10-3), which worsened over time. Good adherence was associated with age >50 years, fewer depression episodes (5% vs. 13%, p = 0.001) and a better mental health component of quality of life (MCS-SF36 47 ±â€¯11 vs. 41 ±â€¯13, p = 0.015). Survival without acute rejection episodes was longer in the adherent class (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of poor adherence in renal transplant patients can be detected as early as one month post-transplantation, using appropriate and easy tools adapted to routine monitoring. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: An early focus on vulnerable patients should allow putting into place actions in order to reduce the risk of poor outcome related to poor adherence.

Outcomes of solid organ transplant recipients with invasive aspergillosis and other mold infections.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the clinical presentation and outcomes of invasive mold infections (IMI) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. METHODS: Inclusion of all SOT recipients with IMI diagnosed between 2008 and 2016 at a referral center for SOT. Univariable analyses identified factors associated with death at one year, and logistic regression models retained independent predictors. RESULTS: Of the 1739 patients that received a SOT during this period, 68 developed IMI (invasive aspergillosis [IA] in 58). Cumulative incidence of IMI at 1 year ranged from 1.2% to 18.8% (kidney and heart transplantation, respectively). At baseline, compared with other IMI, the need for vasoactive drugs was more frequent in patients with IA. During follow-up, 35 patients (51%) were admitted to the ICU and required mechanical ventilation (n = 27), vasoactive drugs (n = 31), or renal replacement therapy (n = 31). The need for vasoactive drugs (OR 7.34; P = .003) and a positive direct examination (OR 10.1; P = .004) were independently associated with the risk of death at 1 year in patients with IA (n = 33; 57%) CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics of IMI at presentation varied according to the underlying transplanted organ and the mold species. Following IA, one-year mortality may be predicted by the need for hemodynamic support and initial fungal load.

Anti-IL-2R blockers comparing with polyclonal antibodies: Higher risk of rejection without negative mid-term outcomes after ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

There is no recommendation regarding the type of induction therapy to use in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the outcome of ABOi living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) recipients who received either polyclonal antibodies or anti-interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) blockers as an induction agent. All ABOi HLA-compatible patients that received a LDKT between 03/11 and 03/18 in three French transplantation center (Paris Saint-Louis, Paris Necker, and Toulouse) were included in the study. Fifty-eight patients were given polyclonal antibodies and 39 patients received anti-IL-2R blockers. We identified by a Cox proportional hazard model the use of polyclonal antibodies as a protective factor against acute rejection (HR = 0.4, 95%CI [0-0.9], P < .05). However, pathological findings on protocol biopsies at 1 year were similar in both groups, as were patient and graft survivals, renal function, and complications. We conclude that the acute rejection rate was significantly higher in patients given anti-IL-2R blockers compared to polyclonal antibodies. However, in our series, there was no negative impact on mid-term outcome.

Outcomes of kidney transplant recipients admitted to the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of 200 patients.

BACKGROUND: Risk of over-immunosuppression or immunization may mitigate the overall and long-term renal outcomes of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) admitted to the ICU in the modern era but remain poorly described. Thus, there is an unmet need to better characterize the survival of KTR admitted to the ICU, but also the renal and immunological outcomes of survivors. METHODS: Retrospective observational study that included 200 KTR admitted between 2010 and 2016 to the ICU of a teaching hospital (median age 61 years [IQR 50.7-68]; time from transplantation 41 months [IQR 5-119]). Survival curves were compared using the Log-rank test. RESULTS: Mortality rates following admission to the ICU was low (26.5% at month-6), mainly related to early mortality (20% in-hospital), and predicted by the severity of the acute condition (SAPS2 score) but also by Epstein Barr Virus proliferation in the weeks preceding the admission to the ICU. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was highly prevalent (85.1%). Progression toward chronic kidney disease (CKD) was observed in 45.1% of survivors. 15.1% of survivors developed new anti-HLA antibodies (donor-specific antibodies 9.2% of cases) that may impact the long-term renal transplantation function. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding the potential biases related to the retrospective and monocentric nature of this study, our findings obtained in a large cohort of KTR suggest that survival of KTR admitted in ICU is good but in-ICU management of these patients may alter both survival and AKI to CKD transition, as well as HLA immunization. Further interventional studies, including systematic characterization of the Epstein Barr virus proliferation at the admission (i.e., a potential surrogate marker of an underlying immune paralysis and frailty) will need to address the optimal management of immunosuppressive regimen in ICU to improve survival but also renal and immunological outcomes.